Capacities vs SiYuan
Capacities is an object-based notes studio where every note is a typed thing — a person, a book, a meeting; SiYuan is a free, open-source, block-based knowledge base with Notion-style databases and local storage. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.
What is Capacities?
Capacities organizes your knowledge by what things are. Instead of files in folders, you create objects — people, books, meetings, projects, quotes — each with its own properties and views, connected through backlinks and daily notes. Browsing by object type (every book you’ve noted, every person you’ve met) falls out of the design for free, and a calendar-centric daily view ties it to your day.
It’s a polished, cloud-based app on web, desktop and mobile, with a generous free core plan; Pro (about $10/month billed annually) adds the AI assistant, calendar sync and advanced queries. In July 2026 it shipped a developer API with OAuth, opening it up to integrations. One deliberate omission to know about: there is no collaboration, and the team has said it isn’t planned — Capacities is intentionally a personal tool.
What is SiYuan?
SiYuan packs a remarkable amount into an open-source (AGPL) package: block-level bidirectional links, WYSIWYG Markdown, Notion-like database and attribute views, spaced-repetition flashcards, a graph, PDF annotation and a plugin marketplace — all stored locally, with the option to self-host the whole thing in Docker. It’s free for personal and commercial use.
Sync is where money changes hands, modestly: a one-time PRO license (~$64) unlocks third-party S3/WebDAV sync, or you can subscribe to the official encrypted cloud service. The developer is China-based with a very active GitHub, and the app is fully usable in English. It’s single-player — no real-time collaboration — but as a personal all-in-one it rivals tools costing $100+/year.
Capacities vs SiYuan at a glance
| Capacities | SiYuan | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Pro ~$9.99/mo annual ($11.99 monthly); Believer ~$12.49/mo | Free; PRO one-time ~$64; optional paid official cloud sync |
| Free plan | Yes — generous core plan | Yes — full core app, commercial use included |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker (self-host) |
| Storage model | Cloud (offline support, not local-first) | Local-first; encrypted sync via official cloud or your own S3/WebDAV |
| Editing model | Object-based pages with properties, blocks and daily notes | Block-based WYSIWYG Markdown with database views |
| Backlinks & wiki links | Yes — backlinks between objects | Yes — block-level bidirectional links |
| Graph view | Yes — per-object connection views | Yes — graph view |
| Search | Full-text; AI search on Pro | Full-text, including SQL-style queries |
| Web capture | Weblink reader and mobile share | Browser clipping extension |
| Email-in capture | No | No |
| RSS / feeds | No | No |
| Team collaboration | No — explicitly not planned | No |
| Publishing & sharing | Read-only share links for pages | Export or self-hosted sharing |
| AI assistant access | Built-in AI assistant (Pro); developer API (OAuth) since 2026 | Configurable OpenAI-compatible integration |
| Offline access | Partial | Yes — fully offline |
| Open source | No | Yes — AGPL-3.0 |
| End-to-end encryption | No | Yes — encrypted sync |
| Data export | Markdown export | Markdown, PDF, and more |
Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.
Where Capacities shines
- Object types with properties give structure without the rigidity of databases or the chaos of free-form notes.
- One of the most polished, beautiful interfaces in the category, consistent across web, desktop and mobile.
- A genuinely useful free plan, with Pro at a mid-pack price.
- Daily notes plus calendar integration make it a natural journal-of-record.
Worth knowing: No collaboration — explicitly not supported and not planned; sharing is read-only page links. Cloud-first and proprietary, with no local-first storage or end-to-end encryption. Power features like queries sit behind Pro, and the object model can feel like ceremony for quick, messy capture.
Where SiYuan shines
- An unusually complete free feature set: block refs, databases, flashcards, PDF annotation, graph — no plugins required.
- Open source (AGPL) with local-first storage and Docker self-hosting.
- Sync your own way — one-time license for S3/WebDAV, or the official encrypted cloud.
- Very active development with a plugin bazaar on top.
Worth knowing: No collaboration and no first-party hosted sharing beyond exports and self-hosting. The interface is denser and less polished than Western commercial rivals, and documentation can be rough in translation. Capture from the web, email or feeds isn’t a focus.
Which should you choose?
Choose Capacities if:
- You think in entities — people, books, meetings — and want your tool to as well.
- Interface polish and aesthetics genuinely affect whether you’ll keep using a tool.
- You’re strictly solo and don’t need sharing or teamwork.
Choose SiYuan if:
- You want maximum capability for minimum (or zero) money, as open source.
- Self-hosting on your own infrastructure appeals to you.
- You want Notion-style databases and flashcards in a local-first app.
A third option: Dexi
If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Capacities and SiYuan?
Capacities is an object-based notes studio where every note is a typed thing — a person, a book, a meeting, while SiYuan is a free, open-source, block-based knowledge base with Notion-style databases and local storage. In practice, Capacities is best for visually minded personal note-takers who think in terms of typed things rather than documents or outlines; SiYuan is best for self-hosters and open-source enthusiasts who want Notion-grade blocks and databases on their own disk.
Which is cheaper, Capacities or SiYuan?
Capacities: Pro ~$9.99/mo annual ($11.99 monthly); Believer ~$12.49/mo (free plan: yes — generous core plan). SiYuan: Free; PRO one-time ~$64; optional paid official cloud sync (free plan: yes — full core app, commercial use included). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.
Is Capacities or SiYuan better for teams?
Capacities — team collaboration: no — explicitly not planned. SiYuan — team collaboration: no. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.
Can I switch between Capacities and SiYuan?
Both tools let you get your data out — Capacities exports via markdown export, and SiYuan via markdown, pdf, and more. Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.
Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.
Try Dexi free