Roam Research vs Tana
Roam Research is the pioneering outliner that made bidirectional links and daily notes famous; Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects. Here’s how they compare on pricing, platforms, linking, search, capture and collaboration — and how to decide between them.
What is Roam Research?
Roam Research kicked off the modern “tools for thought” wave in 2020. Every note is an outline of blocks; any block can be referenced, embedded and linked from anywhere else, and the daily-notes page makes capture frictionless. Bidirectional links — see every place a page is mentioned — were its signature idea, since adopted by nearly every tool in this list.
Roam runs as a cloud-hosted graph with web, desktop and mobile apps, and supports multiplayer shared graphs. It costs $15/month or $165/year (no free plan beyond a 31-day trial), with a $500 five-year “Believer” plan. Development has visibly slowed since its heyday — recent years brought mostly backend work rather than new features — which is worth weighing against its still-excellent core outlining model.
What is Tana?
Tana’s big idea is the supertag: slap #meeting or #person on any outline node and it gains fields, views and behavior — your notes become a queryable database without leaving the outline. Live queries collect matching nodes anywhere in your workspace, which makes Tana feel like Roam and Notion fused together.
Since 2025 Tana has pivoted hard into being an “AI workspace”: a meeting agent that transcribes calls without a bot, voice capture that structures itself, semantic search, and full MCP support so AI assistants can work with your workspace on paid plans. Pricing reflects the AI ambition — a free tier with capped AI usage, Pro at $20/month (early-bird; $30 regular), and a $80+/month Max tier for heavy AI use. It’s cloud-based with web, desktop and capture-focused mobile apps.
Roam Research vs Tana at a glance
| Roam Research | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $15/mo or $165/yr; Believer $500/5 years | Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo |
| Free plan | No — 31-day trial | Yes — with capped AI usage |
| Platforms | Web, desktop apps, mobile apps | Web, macOS, Windows; iOS/Android capture apps |
| Storage model | Cloud-hosted graph database | Cloud |
| Editing model | Outliner — blocks with references and transclusion | Outliner with supertags (typed nodes, fields, live queries) |
| Backlinks & wiki links | Yes — the original bidirectional links, block-level | Yes — references and backlinks |
| Graph view | Yes — graph overview | No traditional graph view |
| Search | Full-text and structured queries | Full-text, structured queries, semantic AI search |
| Web capture | Quick capture on mobile; browser extension | Mobile capture apps, voice capture |
| Email-in capture | No | No |
| RSS / feeds | No | No |
| Team collaboration | Yes — multiplayer shared graphs | Yes — real-time shared workspaces |
| Publishing & sharing | Public graphs | Shared/published nodes |
| AI assistant access | No official AI-assistant integration | Deep native AI + full MCP support (paid plans) |
| Offline access | Partial — desktop app with sync | Limited |
| Open source | No | No |
| End-to-end encryption | Optional encrypted graphs | No |
| Data export | Markdown, JSON, EDN | JSON export (limited) |
Pricing and features as of mid-2026 — check each product’s site for current details.
Where Roam Research shines
- The block-reference model remains best-in-class: reference, embed and remix any bullet anywhere, with transclusion that keeps everything in sync.
- Daily notes as the default entry point suits journaling and interstitial note-taking.
- Powerful queries and roam/js customization for advanced users.
- Multiplayer graphs allow real shared workspaces.
Worth knowing: At $15/month with no free plan, it’s among the priciest tools here. Development pace has slowed markedly, and the mobile experience lags competitors. It’s cloud-hosted and proprietary, with no local-first storage for standard graphs.
Where Tana shines
- Supertags are the most elegant structure system in the category — schema, views and queries grow naturally out of plain outlining.
- The AI feature set is the deepest here: botless meeting transcription, voice capture, agents, and semantic search.
- Full MCP support (on paid plans) makes it one of the few tools built for AI-assistant workflows.
- Real-time multiplayer workspaces work well for teams.
Worth knowing: It’s the most expensive tool in this comparison once you use it seriously — AI usage is metered, and Pro runs $20–30/month. Cloud-only and proprietary: no local files, no end-to-end encryption, and export is limited. The structure-first approach has a real learning curve; casual note-takers may find it over-engineered.
Which should you choose?
Choose Roam Research if:
- Your thinking is outline-shaped and block references are central to how you write.
- You live in daily notes and build structure bottom-up.
- You’re already invested in a Roam graph and its query workflows.
Choose Tana if:
- You want notes with fields, views and queries — a database that emerges from writing.
- Meeting transcription and voice capture are core to your workflow.
- You’ll actually use enough AI to justify the price.
A third option: Dexi
If what you actually want is one searchable place for notes, bookmarks, newsletters and RSS — with tags, @mentions and [[wiki links]] that organize themselves as you write, semantic search that finds ideas even when the words don’t match, and an MCP server so Claude and other AI assistants can work with your notes directly — take a look at Dexi. It’s free for up to 1,000 notes, with no app to install.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Roam Research and Tana?
Roam Research is the pioneering outliner that made bidirectional links and daily notes famous, while Tana is an AI-native outliner where “supertags” turn notes into structured, queryable objects. In practice, Roam Research is best for outline-first thinkers invested in block references and networked daily notes; Tana is best for structured-thinking power users who want their notes to behave like a database, with AI doing the heavy lifting.
Which is cheaper, Roam Research or Tana?
Roam Research: $15/mo or $165/yr; Believer $500/5 years (free plan: no — 31-day trial). Tana: Pro $20/mo (early-bird; $30 regular); Max from $80/mo (free plan: yes — with capped ai usage). Prices as of mid-2026 — check each product's site for current rates.
Is Roam Research or Tana better for teams?
Roam Research — team collaboration: yes — multiplayer shared graphs. Tana — team collaboration: yes — real-time shared workspaces. If neither fits, Dexi's Team plan ($10/member/month) offers per-note sharing with team-wide search.
Can I switch between Roam Research and Tana?
Both tools let you get your data out — Roam Research exports via markdown, json, edn, and Tana via json export (limited). Markdown is the common ground for most migrations, though block references, properties and other tool-specific structure typically need manual cleanup after import.
Collect, connect and search everything you read — free, no credit card required.
Try Dexi free